God and Logical Absolutes |
|
In July 2021, YouTube set all unlisted videos uploaded before 2017 to private (unless the channel owner had opted out). In the weeks leading up to this change, Archive Team archived many pre-2017 unlisted YouTube videos. If this video was uploaded before 2017 and has gone private, there is a chance that a 360p archived version can be viewed on archive.org via the site's Wayback Machine as follows: 1. Enter the YouTube URL in the Wayback Machine form or click on the following link: https://web.archive.org/web/20210000000000*/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYGqNvERxfg 2. Right-click on a blue entry in July in the calendar. 3. Click 'Copy link address'. 4. Paste the copied link address into your web browser's address bar and press enter.
Description: This is a rebuttal video responce to Zkueker88, Matt Slick, miket1m, and Orthodocksee07. In the video I discuss how atheists can account for logic, and logical absolutes, and why this new form of the TAG or transcendental argument is really just dumb. I doubt Matt Slick will even watch this much less respond to it. And no offense to Zack, but I doubt I'll see a valid response to this from him. So this is for all the people who watched their video's and thought they actually had a point: Please don't be fooled, they're fulla' shit. Here are their vids: ORTH: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXsGXmrZZMQ ZKuek: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYAO9o3GNrc Matt SLick: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLWm_123lZU (I'd also like to add this quote I recently found from Einstein regarding the laws of math, and everyone knows that math is a form of logic so I think it applies here. It goes like this: "So far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain. And so far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.") peace -AHughman 
|
